Ajay
Thanks for your quick response.
The material is FERT, Price control is S and this has got a standard cost estimate.
This is a new , regular material which is produced and kept in stock.
As part of extended warranty, if there is a defect in the product which is sold originally, supposed to be replaced by a new or refurbished part.
In our scenario we have a new part which has standard cost as mentioned above.
Now When I tried to use MT 413,
Dr. Cons with cost center and also Sales Order
Cr. Stock
So I could see 2 lines 1st line being cost center, 2nd line being Sales Order.
I could imagine SO is Statistical cost obj and Cost Center real object, but why?
I am moving it from unrestricted to Sales Order stock.
So Sales Order should only be cost object? What is the logic?
Why KI 235 error and because of which only I assigned the cost center in OKB9 for example, just to proceed with the transactions. This is not the right behavior.
So first step I moved the stock from unrestricted to sales order which I could see through t code MB51
Then I did an outbound delivery through VL01N against the sales Order, at that time system did not create an accounting document but only delivered the quantity, so accounting document created.
Answering your question, yes the consumption indicator is E and it maintained as a special stock E and NOT treated as a valuated sales Oder.
In RC configuration the account assignment category is E and Valuation is Blank, as I said, we intentionally do not want to use Valuated Sales Order method for this scenario.
Finally I ran the settlement of sales , first step to calculate RA and then VA88 where the
Dr. P S G Cr. SO.
If the SO was the Statistical object then how was it possible to PSG? After settlement SO balance was zero which I could display through VA03 and cost report
So what will happen to the line item debit against Cost Center.??????...
Revathi.